LawcurbLawcurbTMLegal Intelligence. Simplified.

Bombay Garage Ahmedabad Limited & Ors v. JP Iscon Private Ltd & Anr

2026 INSC 106629 September 202615 min read

Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree, Holds Suit Barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC

The Supreme Court set aside a concurrent decree for specific performance, holding the suit barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC and the oral agreement unproven due to inconsistent pleadings and evidence.

Case Snapshot

Case Name
Bombay Garage Ahmedabad Limited & Ors. v. JP Iscon Private Ltd. & Anr.
Citation
2026 INSC 1066
Bench
Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran
Date of Judgment
September 29, 2026
Area of Law
Civil Procedure — Order II Rule 2 CPC — Specific Performance — Oral Agreement — Concluded Contract
✦

Unlock Full Judgment Analysis

Subscribe to access the complete breakdown of this judgment and all premium research sections.

The Judgment in One Line
Background
Issues Before the Court
Court's Analysis
Decision
Why This Judgment Matters
Subscribe to Continue

Already a subscriber? Log in

Premium Content Locked