LawcurbLawcurbTMLegal Intelligence. Simplified.

Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others

2026 INSC 111212 October 202610 min read

Supreme Court Allows Amendment After Trial Commenced, Holds Subsequent Discovery of Compromise Decree Satisfies Due Diligence

The Supreme Court allowed amendment of the plaint after trial commenced, holding that subsequent discovery of a compromise decree satisfied due diligence and did not change the nature of the suit.

Case Snapshot

Case Name
Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others
Citation
2026 INSC 1112 (Civil Appeal No. 13681 of 2026)
Bench
Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan
Date of Judgment
October 12, 2026
Area of Law
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order VI Rule 17 — Amendment of Pleadings — Due Diligence — Limitation — Compromise Decree
✦

Unlock Full Judgment Analysis

Subscribe to access the complete breakdown of this judgment and all premium research sections.

The Judgment in One Line
Background
Issues Before the Court
Court's Analysis
Decision
Why This Judgment Matters
Subscribe to Continue

Already a subscriber? Log in

Premium Content Locked