LawcurbLawcurbTMLegal Intelligence. Simplified.

Madhu Kudapa (Formerly Known as K Madhusudhan Rao) v. M/s Lodha Healthy Constructions and Developer Private Limited (LHCPL) & Anr

2026 INSC 113115 October 202615 min read

Supreme Court: Borrower Entitled to Refund Only Own Contribution, Not Entire Amount Including Bank Loan

The Supreme Court held that a home buyer who seeks refund is entitled only to the amount paid from his own pocket, not the bank loan amount, to prevent unjust enrichment.

Case Snapshot

Case Name
Madhu Kudapa (Formerly Known as K. Madhusudhan Rao) v. M/s Lodha Healthy Constructions and Developer Private Limited (LHCPL) & Anr.
Citation
2026 INSC 1131
Bench
Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe
Date of Judgment
October 15, 2026
Area of Law
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Unjust Enrichment — Tripartite Agreement — Refund of Housing Loan — Compensation
✦

Unlock Full Judgment Analysis

Subscribe to access the complete breakdown of this judgment and all premium research sections.

The Judgment in One Line
Background
Issues Before the Court
Court's Analysis
Decision
Why This Judgment Matters
Subscribe to Continue

Already a subscriber? Log in

Premium Content Locked